Ngo, Hood, Martin, Painter, Smith & Zappavigna (2022: 25-6):
Salient syllables other than the tonic syllable can be given additional prominence (super-salience) through various means. In (14') the vlogger’s pitch on the first tone group is unusually high, and contrasts with the descending lower pitch of the following tone group (a sing/song effect). We use upward and downward arrows, ‘↑’ and ‘↓’, to signal pronounced salience of this kind.
(14''')
//3 ↑ hopefully next / time I will//1 get my / ↓hair colour / back //
And the vlogger’s eyebrows move up in tune and in sync with the higher pitch on / hopefully /, before lowering again by the end of the following tone group.
The same sing/song effect follows on and culminates this section of the vlog, with a high pitch on the tonic syllable / now // contrasting with the low pitch on / do //. The vlogger’s eyebrows once again move up and down in tune and in sync with the contrasting pitch salience (this time on contrasting tonic syllables).//3 [handclap] / um /but for / ↑now
//3 This will / ↓do //
These rhythmic in-tune gestures reinforce the attitudinal import of the RHYTHM and TONICITY.
Blogger Comments:
This is recycled verbatim from Martin & Zappavigna (2019). Here are the comments from the review of Martin & Zappavigna (2019): Misunderstanding Rhythm And Tonicity.
[1] It will be seen below that not one of syllables discussed here is a non-tonic salient syllable.
[2] Here the authors confuse the textual function of phonological prominence with the interpersonal function of pitch movement.
[3] This misunderstands the data. The "sing/song" effect is a result of the tone sequence 3^13; see [4].
[4] This analysis misrepresents the data. What the speaker actually intones can be phonologically represented as:
With regard to the second tone group, contrary to the authors' claims, hair is a tonic syllable, not a non-tonic salient syllable. This is because hair is the first tonic in a compound tone group.
[5] This claim is manifestly untrue, since if the eyebrows stay raised for two tone groups, it is neither "in sync" with one tone group (TONALITY) nor "in tune" with the major pitch movements (TONE) of the two tone groups: level/low rise – fall – level/low rise.
This is a case of the authors misrepresenting the data in order to make them fit their misunderstandings of Cléirigh's model.
[6] This "same sing/song" effect is this time simply a result of the tone sequence 3^1-. What the speaker actually intones can be phonologically represented as:
[7] Here the authors make a brave stab at guessing what these "rhythmic in-tune" gestures might mean. But the truth lies elsewhere.
Firstly, this is potentially misleading. On Cléirigh's original model, it is only the rhythmic dimension or aspect of a gesture that functions textually like the rhythm of speech, and it is only the rise/fall dimension or aspect of a gesture that functions interpersonally like the pitch movement of speech. Other dimensions or aspects of a gesture may serve additional functions.
Secondly, the notion of 'import' here derives from the work of Martinec (and possibly van Leeuwen), but the authors present it as their own.
Thirdly, the notion of attitudinal import is inappropriate here for two reasons:
Fourthly, as previously explained, the tonic marks the focus of New information, and the non-tonic salient syllables identify the potential foci of New information that the speaker chose not to instantiate.
[2] Here the authors confuse the textual function of phonological prominence with the interpersonal function of pitch movement.
[3] This misunderstands the data. The "sing/song" effect is a result of the tone sequence 3^13; see [4].
[4] This analysis misrepresents the data. What the speaker actually intones can be phonologically represented as:
//3 hopefully / next time I willRegarding the first of these, contrary to the authors' claims, even on their own analysis, time is not a salient syllable, and listening to the data reveals that the "unusually high pitch" extends throughout the tone group, rather than just for the word time.
//13 get my / hair colour / back //
With regard to the second tone group, contrary to the authors' claims, hair is a tonic syllable, not a non-tonic salient syllable. This is because hair is the first tonic in a compound tone group.
[5] This claim is manifestly untrue, since if the eyebrows stay raised for two tone groups, it is neither "in sync" with one tone group (TONALITY) nor "in tune" with the major pitch movements (TONE) of the two tone groups: level/low rise – fall – level/low rise.
This is a case of the authors misrepresenting the data in order to make them fit their misunderstandings of Cléirigh's model.
[6] This "same sing/song" effect is this time simply a result of the tone sequence 3^1-. What the speaker actually intones can be phonologically represented as:
//3 um /but for / now //1- this will / do //That is, the handclap co-occurs with the tonic of the previous tone group, back, and the tone of the second tone group here is a narrow fall (1-), not a level/low-rise (3).
[7] Here the authors make a brave stab at guessing what these "rhythmic in-tune" gestures might mean. But the truth lies elsewhere.
Firstly, this is potentially misleading. On Cléirigh's original model, it is only the rhythmic dimension or aspect of a gesture that functions textually like the rhythm of speech, and it is only the rise/fall dimension or aspect of a gesture that functions interpersonally like the pitch movement of speech. Other dimensions or aspects of a gesture may serve additional functions.
Secondly, the notion of 'import' here derives from the work of Martinec (and possibly van Leeuwen), but the authors present it as their own.
Thirdly, the notion of attitudinal import is inappropriate here for two reasons:
- attitude is concerned with interpersonal meaning whereas rhythm and tonicity are concerned with textual meaning, and
- there are no instances of attitude in the instances of text under discussion.
Fourthly, as previously explained, the tonic marks the focus of New information, and the non-tonic salient syllables identify the potential foci of New information that the speaker chose not to instantiate.
No comments:
Post a Comment